Here’s the latest op-ed I sent to local newspapers on behalf of the Parents Television Council. They are avid news and media advocates as a way to spread their message. Let me know if you see it printed in any newspapers because they frequently print it and don’t let me know. Luckily I have friends and neighbors who read the editorials and let me know when my name pops up.
Fox, Foul Language and the First Amendment
On October 21st Peter Chernin, President and Chief Operating Officer of News Corp.,was given the Media Institute’s “Freedom of Speech” award. In accepting the award, Chernin boasted that Fox will “fight to the end for our ability to put occasionally controversial, offensive, and even tasteless content on the air.” He also claimed that fining indecent content on broadcast TV will somehow automatically lead to the overthrow of the democratic process in American politics.
Limiting political speech is not what is at issue. What Chernin and his fellow media bosses truly oppose are any limits whatsoever on indecent broadcast TV content. This was made manifest back on August 1st, when ABC, CBS and NBC filed briefs with the U.S. Supreme Court to defend Fox’s claim that airing the “F-word” and “S-word” during two Fox awards show broadcasts was not indecent and should not be fined.
With the Supreme Court scheduled on November 4th to review a lower court’s ruling that the use of the”F-word” is merely a “fleeting profanity” and that the networks should not be fined for airing such language, the broadcast networks are doing everything possible to ensure that their “right” to blare offensive programming over the publicly-owned airwaves into American homes meets with no opposition.
Unlike many other nations, in the United States the government does not monopolize control of the airwaves — nor does it require TV networks to pay for their use of same. The broadcast networks are allowed exclusive use of a public utility, for free, and use it to make billions of dollars a year in profit. All the American people have ever asked in return is that the networks use the airwaves in the public interest. But now, the networks arrogantly claim that their alleged “right” to spew profanity, graphic sex and heinous violence trumps the best interests of America’s children and the desires of the American people.
It is common sense that trashy TV leads to undesirable outcomes in our society. This last week we were provided with some research to confirm the obvious. Researchers at the RAND research organization said their three-year study was the first to link viewing of racy television programing with risky sexual behavior by teens. “Our findings suggest that television may play a significant role in the high rates of teenage pregnancy in the United States,” said Anita Chandra, a behavioral scientist who led the research at RAND, a nonprofit research organization.
Our nation’s media is on a slippery slope. As we watch to see what the Supreme Court’s ruling is on the “fleeting profanity” case, we should also continue to vigilantly watch what is being absorbed into our family’s daily diet of media.
Mapleton, UT